Peer Review Process 3
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF EVALUATES MANUSCRIPT, DECIDES ON CONTINUE
The peer review process in clinical psychology journals confirms the validity and ensures the scientific correctness of published articles.
Single Blind Review: The reviewers know the names of the authors, but the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. The majority of manuscripts are reviewed in a single-blind process.
It helps maintain the quality of published articles and ensures that the information presented is accurate, relevant, and useful to the clinical psychology community.
Peer Review Process
3. Editor-in-Chief assesses the manuscript and decides whether to proceed:
Reject without review
Peer review starts
Double Blind Review: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript.